May2016
Russia
launches military operations in Syria
The
sidelines of the 2015 U.N. General Assembly in New York witnessed meetings held
between U.S. President Barack Obama and his Russian counterpart Vladimir Putin
over the fate of Syria. The main subject was Russia’s military intervention in
Syria, yet no particular conclusion was reached. Putin began his air campaign
in Syria on September 30th. Homs, then held by opposition forces,
was the first city attacked by Russian warplanes.
Russia
continuously claimed to target Daesh (ISIS, ISIL) targets. However, facts on
the ground showed only 10% of Russia’s bombings actually hit Daesh positions,
while the remaining 90% were focused on Free Syrian Army positions and other
groups.
Before
Russia launched its attacks the Syrian regime was in a dire status and experts
believed Assad would fall in a matter of months. However, Russian airstrikes
and the Revolutionary Guards, Iraqi Shiite militias and the Lebanese Hezbollah
on the ground were able to salvage Assad’s rule, allowing his troops to make
significant gains against opposition rebels.
Russia
and the United States proposed a plan for a “cessation of hostilities”
establishing a ceasefire from February 27th. Up to this point
Russia’s airstrikes had continued for five months.
Airstrikes
and Casualties
The
Russian Defense Ministry reported over 9,000 sorties were carried out in the
span of five months, killing 2,000 militants. Human Rights Watch in Syria said
1,700 civilians were also killed by Russia’s military operations.
Russia
Pulling Out
At
8 pm of March 14th, prior to the Geneva negotiations, Putin held a
session with his Foreign and Defense ministers announcing Russian forces’
intention to withdraw from Syria. Russia’s military intervention had widely
achieved its goals and Moscow’s diplomatic role in negotiations to end the war
in Syria will increase, he added. These forces began pulling out of Syria on
Saturday, March 15th.
Russia
Putin
informed Bashar Assad over the phone of Moscow’s decision, adding Russia will
continue supporting the Syrian government. The Hamimim airbase and Tartus naval
base will continue their activities. The Russian Ambassador to the U.N. said
these measures will support the political solution. Kremlin spokesman Dmitry
Peskov said this decision has not been raised with Western officials and is
an expertise conclusion. Lavrov said these measures are aimed at
safeguarding the Syrian people’s interests and we will continue to cooperate
with the United States in the fight against terrorists in Syria. The
Russian Parliament Defense Committee said Moscow will remain committed to
providing weapons, military technology and training Syrian experts.
Iran
Iranian
Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif said Russia pulling out its forces shows
they see no immediate need to resort to the military option in order to
maintain a ceasefire.
Ali
Akbar Velayati, foreign policy advisor to Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei, said
there will not be any changes made to the general cooperation between Russia,
Syria, the Lebanese Hezbollah and Iran. Anyhow, whenever needed they will once
again take action in their very important struggle against terrorism, he added.
Iranian
Parliament Speaker Ali Larijani met with Faisal Meqdad, deputy foreign minister
of Syria on Tuesday, March 15th, yet made no reference to Russia’s
decision.
Royoran,
a political expert in Iran: “First of all, Russia has not recalled all of its
forces. A portion of their forces have been recalled and they have taken back a
number of their planes, while maintaining their advanced fighter jets in Syria.
They have preserved their two bases in Hamimim and Tartous. The second issue is
that Russia has announced these measures are to facilitate talks. If talks were
actually held, the better, and the political solution will advance. If the
opponents violate the ceasefire, Russia will return.”
Syrian
Opposition
Senior
Syrian opposition figure George Sabra: Russian forces leaving Syria should have
a positive reflection on the negotiations in Geneva.
Ahmed
al-Asrawi, member of the Syrian High Negotiating Committee: Russian forces
departing Syria will support resolving the Syrian political crisis.
The
Syrian opposition in Geneva said Russia’s retreat from Syria will increase
pressures on the Assad regime and lead to change. The opposition also called
for investigations on the ground to confirm Russia’s withdrawal. While
welcoming this new development the Syrian opposition added if such measures are
serious they will act positively for the negotiations.
Ans
Abde, President of the National Revolution Forces and Syrian opposition said,
“This is the right move during negotiations over political transition, showing
there are rifts between Russia and Bashar Assad. Moreover, no joint statement
has been presented on the withdrawal of Russian forces.”
Manzar
Makhous, a member of the Syrian High Negotiating Committee said this withdrawal
is part of the main Russia forces in Syria and completely changes the equation
in this country. This has been described as a step accelerating the overthrow
of Assad’s dynasty.
Salem
Mosalat, spokesman of the Syrian High Negotiating Committee emphasized, “We
would like to see Russia be our friend in Syria,” adding, “Such a measure will
act positively in the Geneva negotiations to resolve the Syria crisis.” He
wished this decision would become practical as soon as possible.
Leader
of the Freedom Army stationed in Hama Province reported this new development
has raised the spirits of his group, adding they are certain the Assad regime
cannot remain intact without foreign support.
United
Nations
U.N.
Special Envoy to Syria Stefan de Mistura explained the Russian decision based
on pulling out the bulk of its forces from Syria is an important development in
this day and age that will have a positive impact on the negotiations.
United
States
Only
a few moments after Putin’s remarks were aired by Russian TV, White House Press
Secretary Josh Earnest said we have to wait and see what is Russia’s exact
intention, without expressing any other perspectives.
It
is still too early to judge Putin’s objective, why such a decision was made and
will it be implemented or not, said another U.S. official.
U.S.
Secretary of State John Kerry said this maybe the best opportunity to end the
5-year-long Syria civil war, adding his intention to visit Russia and meet
Putin for this very purpose.
Pentagon
spokesman Peter Cook said if the Russians truly pull out their forces from
Syria, then it will be good news and a vital move in the peace process.
However, there is still not enough information about how this will be carried
out, as the Russians had also talked about pulling out troops involved in
Ukraine. However, the world only witnessed the transfer of Russia’s forces, he
added
Syrian
regime
The
state Syria news agency cited Bashar Assad saying the Russian military will
never completely evacuate Syria. Russia will adjust the number of forces on the
ground according to the scene, and the continued trend of the cessation of
hostilities. Cooperation between Russia and Syrian forces guaranteed victories
against terrorism and restored security to this country.
The
Syrian presidency issued a statement saying: What is being reported by the
media and social media about rifts between Russia and Syria following Moscow’s
decision to pull out its forces are baseless. Simultaneously, Interfax quoted the
chair of the Russian Senate Defense Committee writing around 800 personnel,
including military advisors, will remain in Syria, and the S-400 missile
defense system that Russia transferred to Syria following Turkey downing one of
its jets will remain intact.
Evaluation
1.
Putin’s decision came out of the blue, and one can sense the sudden nature in
the reactions seen from the U.S., Iran and Bashar Assad himself.
2.
Putin’s telephone call with Obama following the announcement of pulling troops
out of Syria shows this measure was not coordinated with Washington. Moscow
also explained no discussions were held in this regard with any Western country.
3.
The reasons behind Putin’s decision:
-
The country’s economic situation and Moscow having a limited military budget,
making it unable to continue a bombing campaign similar to the U.S.
- Advances
made by the Syrian regime and Iran-backed forces under Russian air cover were
very dismal against Syrian opposition forces. Russia had gone to great lengths
in the five months of non-stop airstrikes. Therefore, Moscow realized there was
no end sight, and so it used the opportunity in the ceasefire and under the
excuse of negotiations to portray itself as an advocate of a political solution,
and thus pull out of the Syria quagmire.
4. On the other hand, in negotiations between the
Syrian opposition and the regime, Bashar Assad raised the thought of cancelling
any transitional period, and effectively placed the Geneva negotiations before
an impasse. As a result de Mistura announced if the negotiations fail the issue
will be referred to the U.N. and “Plan B” would be implemented. On the other
hand, the five major industrial countries warned Bashar Assad that Putin sought
to caution him by pulling out of Syria and place pressure on Assad to continue
the negotiations.
5. The Iranian regime is attempting to portray
this decision by Russia as a temporary and returnable development, knowing this
move by Moscow will have major consequences on the ground against its
interests.
6. It doesn’t appear Russia has the intention to
return to the clashes following Putin’s decision. Furthermore, Russian Senate
Defense Committee chair said only 800 Russians will remain in Syria.
7. Prior to the announcement of Russian forces
pulling out, the Syrian regime’s position regarding the Geneva negotiations was
very aggressive, as if it has already failed before ever beginning. However, Assad
said he would support a political solution in Syria following Moscow’s
announcement of pulling out its troops.
8. This move by Russia has led to a more unified
Syrian opposition force. This very subject has significantly terrified the
Syrian regime. The Syrian opposition widely welcomed this announcement by Russia.
No comments:
Post a Comment