December 2015
Various Syrian opposition forces
last week held a summit in Riyadh of Saudi Arabia where they reached important
common grounds that can be a starting point to end the war and bloodshed in
Syria, or at least shorten its duration significantly; however, this agreement
has infuriated the mullahs’ regime in Iran. The question is why has Tehran
become so angry in response to this opposition summit and a perspective of the
war ending in Syria?
The Syrian opposition
conference, hosted and organized by the Saudi government, is considered a blow
to the Iranian regime from various viewpoints:
Firstly, the mere formation and
holding of such a conference gathering various political and military groups
and forces, all under one roof in the Saudi capital, was in itself a serious
success for those opposing the Assad regime, and a major defeat for Damascus
and its main ally, being Tehran.
Secondly, these forces were able
to reach agreements on two different subjects, the most important of which was
electing a delegation for the New York negotiations to represent the various
groups. These talks began on December 18th and are to last for 5
days. The Iranian regime has in its propaganda claimed this summit will end in
a failure and different Syrian groups will not be able to reach an agreement.
Tehran focused its propaganda and hindering measures in this regard to the
utmost extent.
Thirdly, the Iranian regime was
completely secluded in this whole trend, as it stood out as
the elephant in the room, being the only party alongside the Bashar Assad
regime and against this conference. According to various reports even Russia
was in agreement with this conference and on Tuesday, U.S. Secretary of State
John Kerry went to Moscow, with his talks focusing on Syria and the decisions
made in the Syria conference. Political analysts believe this visit was based
on Washington and Moscow’s agreement on various issues regarding Syria, or else
Kerry would have never travelled to Moscow.
On the
other hand, many political experts consider the U.S. actively entering the
subject of Syria and its backing of the Riyadh conference as a major shift in
gear that will accelerate all developments.
Another
matter that has further politically isolated the Iranian regime and is
strategically important is the Iranian regime’s series of defeats inside Syria.
The main sign is the killing of its highest ranking Revolutionary Guards commanders
in Syria, and Quds Force chief Qassem Suleimani being severely wounded and
forced to return to Iran. News reports indicate that as a result of these
defeats the Iranian regime has been forced to withdraw its forces from active
battlegrounds in Syria. This report was published a few days ago by Bloomberg
news agency and The Washington Post, and even the regime’s own outlets cited
these developments. Another sign of the regime’s withdrawal being a policy matter
is seen in the remarks made by a regime parliament member during an open-door
session last Tuesday. Apparently he literally described the Assad regime as the
murderer of the Syrian people. He also blasted the policy of supporting such a
regime. It is also good to know that in that meeting none of the other
parliament members said a word or jumped into his remarks.
These are
all signs of the beginning of the end of the Iranian regime’s main pillar of it
strategic depth in the Middle East. Let’s not forget that Tehran officials have
described Syria as Iran’s 35th province, and losing Syria will have
more devastating impacts than its nuclear setbacks.
No comments:
Post a Comment